Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:20

Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why Some People Hear Better in Noise Than Others - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
As a Chinese, what disgusts you about the Chinese society today?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What misfortune led to an important discovery?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Rare ‘Einstein zig-zag’ sheds light on universe’s hidden forces - The Brighter Side of News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Summer Game Fest releases hype trailer ahead of weekend of reveals - Eurogamer
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
37 Hidden Gems On Amazon That’ll Make You Think “Where Have You Been All My Life?” - BuzzFeed
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging - Times of India